We are seeing patients in-person and through Video Visits. Learn more about how we’re keeping you safe and please review our updated visitor policy. Please also consider supporting Weill Cornell Medicine’s efforts to support our front-line workers.
Department of Anesthesiology

You are here

Stimulus frequency and dose-respone curve to d-tubocurarine in man.

TitleStimulus frequency and dose-respone curve to d-tubocurarine in man.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication1980
AuthorsAli HH, Savarese JJ
Date Published1980 Jan
KeywordsAdult, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Electric Stimulation, Humans, Intubation, Intratracheal, Middle Aged, Neuromuscular Junction, Time Factors, Tubocurarine, Ulnar Nerve

The relationship of the frequency of motor-nerve stimulation to the dose--response to d-tubocurarine was studied in 45 adult patients during nitrous oxide--oxygen--morphine--thiopental anesthesia. One of five stimulus frequencies, 0.1, 0.15, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 Hz, was employed in each of five groups of nine patients. Cumulative dose-response curves for inhibition of evoked thumb adduction were constructed at each frequency on log probit scales and the ED50 and ED95 values were determined. The apparent potencies of d-tubocurarine at 0.5 and1.0 Hz were significantly different from that at 0.1 Hz; for example, at 0.1 Hz the ED50 and ED95 were 0.25 and 0.52 mg/kg, respectively. The corresponding values at 1.0 Hz were 0.07 and 0.15 mg/kg, respectively, or approximately 3.5 times less. The durations of recoveries of the twitch from 5--25 per cent of control at 1.0 and 0.5 Hz were 13 +/- 2 min (mean +/- SE) and 20 +/- 2 min, respectively. These durations were significantly different from that at 0.1 Hz (30 +/- 2 min). These results emphasize the importance of defining the stimulus frequency for meaningful interpretation of the dose--response relationships for nondepolarizing relaxants in man. Slow stimulus rates (0.1--0.15 Hz) are most useful clinically, since all levels of clinical relaxation can be achieved at these rates without abolishing the evoked twitch response.

Alternate JournalAnesthesiology
PubMed ID7352643