For information about COVID-19, including symptoms and prevention, please read our COVID-19 patient guide. If you need to see your provider, please contact us to see if a Video Visit is right for you. Please also consider supporting Weill Cornell Medicine’s efforts against the pandemic.
Department of Anesthesiology

You are here

Sex differences on the judgment of line orientation task: a function of landmark presence and hormonal status.

TitleSex differences on the judgment of line orientation task: a function of landmark presence and hormonal status.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2012
AuthorsGoyette SRamos, McCoy JG, Kennedy A, Sullivan M
JournalPhysiol Behav
Date Published2012 Feb 28
KeywordsCues, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Orientation, Psychomotor Performance, Saliva, Sex Characteristics, Space Perception, Testosterone, Young Adult

It has been well-established that men outperform women on some spatial tasks. The tools commonly used to demonstrate this difference (e.g. The Mental Rotations Task) typically involve problems and solutions that are presented in a context devoid of referents. The study presented here assessed whether the addition of referents (or "landmarks") would attenuate the well-established sex difference on the judgment of line orientation task (JLOT). Three versions of the JLOT were presented in a within design. The first iteration contained the original JLOT (JLOT 1). JLOT 2 contained three "landmarks" or referents and JLOT 3 contained only one landmark. The sex difference on JLOT 1 was completely negated by the addition of three landmarks on JLOT 2 or the addition of one landmark on JLOT3. In addition, salivary testosterone was measured. In men, gains in performance on the JLOT due to the addition of landmarks were positively correlated with testosterone levels. This suggests that men with the highest testosterone levels benefited the most from the addition of landmarks. These data help to highlight different strategies used by men and women to solve spatial tasks.

Alternate JournalPhysiol. Behav.
PubMed ID22154804