We are seeing patients in-person and through Video Visits. Learn more about how we’re keeping you safe and please review our updated visitor policy. Please also consider supporting Weill Cornell Medicine’s efforts to support our front-line workers.

Prosthetic aortic graft replacement of the ascending thoracic aorta alters biomechanics of the native descending aorta as assessed by transthoracic echocardiography.

TitleProsthetic aortic graft replacement of the ascending thoracic aorta alters biomechanics of the native descending aorta as assessed by transthoracic echocardiography.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsPalumbo MC, Rong LQ, Kim J, Navid P, Sultana R, Butcher J, Redaelli A, Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Girardi LN, Gaudino MFL, Weinsaft JW
JournalPLoS One
Volume15
Issue3
Paginatione0230208
Date Published2020
ISSN1932-6203
KeywordsAdult, Aged, Aneurysm, Dissecting, Aorta, Thoracic, Aortic Aneurysm, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Aortic Diseases, Aortic Valve Insufficiency, Blood Pressure, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Echocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Vascular Stiffness
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In patients with ascending aortic (AA) aneurysms, prosthetic graft replacement yields benefit but risk for complications in the descending aorta persists. Longitudinal impact of AA grafts on native descending aortic physiology is poorly understood.

METHODS: Transthoracic echocardiograms (echo) in patients undergoing AA elective surgical grafting were analyzed: Descending aortic deformation indices included global circumferential strain (GCS), time to peak (TTP) strain, and fractional area change (FAC). Computed tomography (CT) was used to assess aortic wall thickness and calcification.

RESULTS: 46 patients undergoing AA grafting were studied; 65% had congenital or genetically-associated AA (30% bicuspid valve, 22% Marfan, 13% other): After grafting (6.4±7.5 months), native descending aortic distension increased, irrespective of whether assessed based on circumferential strain or area-based methods (both p<0.001). Increased distensibility paralleled altered kinetics, as evidenced by decreased time to peak strain (p = 0.01) and increased velocity (p = 0.002). Augmented distensibility and flow velocity occurred despite similar pre- and post-graft blood pressure and medications (all p = NS), and was independent of pre-surgical aortic regurgitation or change in left ventricular stroke volume (both p = NS). Magnitude of change in GCS and FAC was 5-10 fold greater among patients with congenital or genetically associated AA vs. degenerative AA (p<0.001), paralleling larger descending aortic size, greater wall thickness, and higher prevalence of calcific atherosclerotic plaque in the degenerative group (all p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, congenital/genetically associated AA etiology conferred a 4-fold increment in magnitude of augmented native descending aortic strain after proximal grafting (B = 4.19 [CI 1.6, 6.8]; p = 0.002) independent of age and descending aortic size.

CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic graft replacement of the ascending aorta increases magnitude and rapidity of distal aortic distension. Graft effects are greatest with congenital or genetically associated AA, providing a potential mechanism for increased energy transmission to the native descending aorta and adverse post-surgical aortic remodeling.

DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0230208
Alternate JournalPLoS ONE
PubMed ID32163486
PubMed Central IDPMC7067394
Grant ListR01 HL128278 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
K23 HL140092 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States