Knowledge of legal rights as a factor of refugee and asylum seekers' health status: a qualitative study.

TitleKnowledge of legal rights as a factor of refugee and asylum seekers' health status: a qualitative study.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2023
AuthorsPilato TC, Taki F, Sbrollini K, Drake APurington, Maley B, Yale-Loehr S, Powers JL, Bazarova NN, Bhandari A, Kaur G
JournalBMJ Open
Volume13
Issue2
Paginatione063291
Date Published2023 Feb 10
ISSN2044-6055
KeywordsAdolescent, Adult, Civil Rights, Health Services Accessibility, Health Status, Humans, Qualitative Research, Refugees
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine health behaviours of refugees and asylum seekers, in relation to their knowledge of public benefits and legal rights.

DESIGN: Qualitative study, utilising an open-ended, semi-structured interview guide to ensure information-rich data collection. Thematic content was analysed using qualitative research software.

SETTING: Participants were drawn from the Weill Cornell Center for Human Rights (WCCHR) in New York City, a single-center, human rights clinic with a globally representative patient population. All interviews were conducted at the Weill Cornell Medicine Clinical and Translational Science Center, a multidisciplinary space within an urban academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four refugees and asylum seekers currently living in the greater New York City area. Eligible participants were 18 years of age or older and had previously sought services from the WCCHR. The recruitment rate was 55%.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes and concepts in participants' health, knowledge, perceptions of and experiences with accessing healthcare and public benefits programmes.

RESULTS: Twenty-four participants represented 18 countries of origin and 11 primary languages. Several impediments to accessing healthcare and public benefits were identified, including pragmatic barriers (such as prohibitive costs or lack of insurance), knowledge gaps and mistrust of healthcare systems.

CONCLUSIONS: There is low health engagement by refugees and asylum seekers, as a result of multiple, complex factors impeding the ability of refugee and asylum seekers to access healthcare and other public benefits for which they are eligible-with resultant detrimental health effects. However, there is an opportunity to utilise novel approaches, such as digital technologies, to communicate relevant information regarding legal rights and public benefits to advance the health of vulnerable individuals such as refugees and asylum seekers.

DOI10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063291
Alternate JournalBMJ Open
PubMed ID36764728
PubMed Central IDPMC9923268
Grant ListK23 NS116114 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States