Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine appointments are available to our patients. Sign up for Connect today to schedule your vaccination. Continue your routine care with us by scheduling an in-person appointment or Video Visit.

Failure of SCS MR-Conditional Modes Due to High Impedance: A Review of Literature and Case Series.

TitleFailure of SCS MR-Conditional Modes Due to High Impedance: A Review of Literature and Case Series.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsJotwani R, Abd-Elsayed A, Villegas K, Shakil A, Gulati A, Sayed D, Lam C, Mehta N
JournalPain Ther
Date Published2020 Nov 21
ISSN2193-8237
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conditional modes are a novel feature for certain Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices. However, there is a paucity of literature around the limitation of MRI-conditional modes ("MRI safe"), specifically in clinical scenarios where urgent MRIs may be needed. One such limitation is load impedance, referring to the circuit's resistance to the current being generated by the system. High impedance can limit the MRI-conditional mode capability, presenting potential harm to a patient undergoing an MRI or make an MRI unable to be completed.

METHODS: Three cases were identified, and informed consent was obtained. All information was obtained via retrospective chart review.

RESULTS: In this case series of three patients where MRI-conditional SCS systems were unable to be placed in "MRI safe" settings, preventing timely MRI study completion in the setting of high impedance, all three were required to undergo alternative imaging including CT scans, and two patients ultimately had the system explanted and one chose to be re-implanted after completion of scans.

CONCLUSION: This case series highlights the need for further investigation of impedance in SCS systems and potential limitations for future MRI usage. The review of literature of impedance in SCS shows both device- and physiologic-related etiologies for changes in impedance that warrant consideration by the implanting physician.

DOI10.1007/s40122-020-00219-8
Alternate JournalPain Ther
PubMed ID33219927